Revenue lines
Corridor does not take a share of yield on customer balances: the balances sit in the customer’s own vaults. The take on routed volume lands at about 0.30% all in, a fraction of what the same payment costs through correspondent banks today.
One customer
A mid-size payout company settling $5M a month through Corridor:At the scale of the market
Revenue at a 0.30% take on a share of global B2B stablecoin payments ([620B.These are scenarios, not forecasts: they count routed volume only and leave out subscriptions. The live version is the interactive simulator on the Corridor website.
Why the margin holds
- Network effects. Each partner added reaches every customer and every other region. Customers get more corridors without more integrations, which raises switching costs.
- System of record. The operations team’s ledger, exceptions and audit history live in Corridor. Providers become interchangeable venues; Corridor does not.
- Data compounds. Pre-funding forecasts improve with volume per corridor, and reconciliation history becomes audit evidence.
- Cheap rails underneath. Hub settlement costs fractions of a cent per transfer on Tempo, and bridge hops cost fractions of a cent on Across, so the take is margin rather than pass-through.
Go-to-market
1
Land read-only
Licensed payout companies paying into Africa, starting with EUR → NGN: a 60-day read-only pilot on the wallets they already run.
2
Route
Move payouts through Corridor on the customer’s own signer, settling on Tempo.
3
Reverse the flow
The same customers’ importer clients paying suppliers in Asia and the Americas (NGN → CNY first), on the same integration.
4
Add spokes along trade routes
Every ramp or payout partner signed becomes a spoke for every customer: Latin America, the Middle East and Asia next.