> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://corridor.udokaam.dev/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Business model

> A ledger subscription from the first read-only pilot, a take on volume Corridor routes, unit economics for one customer, and revenue scenarios against global B2B stablecoin payments.

Corridor earns before it moves a dollar: the ledger and reconciliation are a subscription from the first read-only pilot. Once the customer routes payouts through Corridor, it also earns on that volume.

## Revenue lines

| Line | Indicative pricing | Charged on |
| - | - | - |
| Ledger and reconciliation subscription | $1,500 – $3,000 per month | Per customer, from the read-only pilot onwards: matching, exceptions, exports, disclosures |
| Routing fee | 0.10% – 0.30% of volume | Payouts and collections Corridor moves on the customer's signer |
| FX spread share | \~0.10% | Conversions priced by partners, shared with Corridor |

Corridor does not take a share of yield on customer balances: the balances sit in the customer's own vaults. The take on routed volume lands at about **0.30% all in**, a fraction of what the same payment costs through correspondent banks today.

## One customer

A mid-size payout company settling **\$5M a month** through Corridor:

| Item | Value |
| - | - |
| Annual volume | \$60M |
| All-in take | \~0.30% |
| Subscription | \~\$24K a year, from month one |
| **Annual revenue** | **\~\$200K** |

## At the scale of the market

Revenue at a 0.30% take on a share of global B2B stablecoin payments (\[$226B in 2025](/market/global-opportunity)). The 2028 column assumes they grow 40% a year, which gives about $620B.

| Share of the flow | Settled (today) | Revenue (today) | Settled (2028) | Revenue (2028) |
| - | - | - | - | - |
| 1% | \$2.3B | \$6.8M | \$6.2B | \$18.6M |
| 5% | \$11.3B | \$33.9M | \$31.0B | \$93.0M |
| 10% | \$22.6B | \$67.8M | \$62.0B | \$186.0M |
| 15% | \$33.9B | \$101.7M | \$93.0B | \$279.1M |

<Note>
  These are scenarios, not forecasts: they count routed volume only and leave out subscriptions. The live version is the interactive simulator on the [Corridor website](https://corridorapp.udokaam.dev/#economics).
</Note>

## Why the margin holds

* **Network effects.** Each partner added reaches every customer and every other region. Customers get more corridors without more integrations, which raises switching costs.
* **System of record.** The operations team's ledger, exceptions and audit history live in Corridor. Providers become interchangeable venues; Corridor does not.
* **Data compounds.** Pre-funding forecasts improve with volume per corridor, and reconciliation history becomes audit evidence.
* **Cheap rails underneath.** Hub settlement costs fractions of a cent per transfer on Tempo, and bridge hops cost fractions of a cent on Across, so the take is margin rather than pass-through.

## Go-to-market

<Steps>
  <Step title="Land read-only">
    Licensed payout companies paying into Africa, starting with EUR → NGN: a 60-day read-only pilot on the wallets they already run.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Route">
    Move payouts through Corridor on the customer's own signer, settling on Tempo.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Reverse the flow">
    The same customers' importer clients paying suppliers in Asia and the Americas (NGN → CNY first), on the same integration.
  </Step>

  <Step title="Add spokes along trade routes">
    Every ramp or payout partner signed becomes a spoke for every customer: Latin America, the Middle East and Asia next.
  </Step>
</Steps>


This documentation is built and hosted on [Mintlify](https://mintlify.com), a developer documentation platform.